Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950

Portability
90
Imaging
37
Features
46
Overall
40
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
Portability
89
Imaging
34
Features
29
Overall
32

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2012
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Launched June 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and Z950 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The Fujifilm XF1 was announced 2 years later than the Z950 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm XF1 matches up against the Z950 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Kodak Z950

 Fujifilm XF1 Z950 
LaunchedSeptember 2012June 2010More recent by 28 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm XF1

 Z950 Fujifilm XF1 

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Z950

 Fujifilm XF1 Z950 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 has external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus the Z950.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and Z950 is 90 and 89 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XF1 and Z950.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 uses the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The younger Fujifilm XF1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Portrait photography features
Kodak Z950 Portrait photography features
42
focusing manually
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
28
you can focus manually
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Street photography highlights
Kodak Z950 Street photography highlights
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
sensor is small (2/3")
more heavy than average in class (255 grams)
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than others in class (243 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Sports photography factors
Kodak Z950 Sports photography factors
31
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250 seconds)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Travel photography advice
Kodak Z950 Travel photography advice
60
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (255g)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
52
has built in flash
very long zoom (350mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (243g)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Landscape photography camera
53
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
37
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak Z950 as a Vlogging camera
34
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than average in class (255g)
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
heavier than others in class (243g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Z950
 Fujifilm XF1Kodak EasyShare Z950
General Information
Make FujiFilm Kodak
Model Fujifilm XF1 Kodak EasyShare Z950
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-09-17 2010-06-16
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 35-350mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus distance 3cm 6cm
Crop factor 4.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 1/8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1250s
Continuous shutter rate 7.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.40 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 255 gr (0.56 lb) 243 gr (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 199 not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $380 $250