Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2012
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released March 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus SH-1
  • Renewed by Olympus SH-3
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

Below is a detailed overview of the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SH-2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and SH-2 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

The Fujifilm XF1 was manufactured 3 years before the SH-2 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades versus the SH-2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus SH-2

 Fujifilm XF1 SH-2 
Manually focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Fujifilm XF1

 SH-2 Fujifilm XF1 
ReleasedMarch 2015September 2012More recent by 30 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SH-2

 Fujifilm XF1 SH-2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF1 offers outer dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SH-2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the SH-2.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and SH-2 is 90 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and SH-2.

As you can see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus SH-2 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older Fujifilm XF1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm XF1
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-2
42
has manual focus
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
44
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Street photography information
Olympus SH-2 Street photography information
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (2/3")
heavier than competition in class (255g)
70
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
has focus via touch
lighter than competitors in class (271g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Sports photography camera
31
has image stabilization (Optical)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
lacks phase detect AF
51
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
includes tracking focus
good battery (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Travel photography highlights
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography highlights
60
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (255g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
74
good battery (380 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (271g)
has focus via touch
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Landscape photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography advice
54
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
does not have Time Lapse mode
55
quite wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
saves RAW files
good battery (380 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Vlogging advice
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging advice
34
relatively wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have mic jack
heavier than competition in class (255g)
35
quite wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (271 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SH-2
 Fujifilm XF1Olympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm XF1 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-09-17 2015-03-11
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range 3cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames per second 11.5 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 255g (0.56 pounds) 271g (0.60 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 199 not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $380 $399