Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus 6020, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and 6020 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XF1 was released 2 years after the 6020 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores versus the 6020 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XF1 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm XF1 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 32 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm XF1
| 6020 | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm XF1 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XF1 has outside dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus the 6020.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XF1 and 6020 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XF1 and 6020.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XF1 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus 6020 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XF1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $380 | $279 |