Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2012
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XF1 was revealed 8 months after the TG-820 iHS so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades versus the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XF1 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Fujifilm XF1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Fujifilm XF1
| TG-820 iHS | Fujifilm XF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Fujifilm XF1 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XF1 provides physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XF1 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XF1 provides the larger sensor which should make achieving bokeh simpler. The more recent Fujifilm XF1 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm XF1
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
manual focus
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (2/3")
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Fujifilm XF1 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
sensor size is small (2/3")
heavier than competitors in class (255 grams)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm XF1 Sports photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography details
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (2/3")
no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
max fps low (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XF1 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography information
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (255g)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
weather proofing
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XF1 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography advice
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (2/3")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not available
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XF1 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (255g)
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $500 |