Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XF1 was revealed 9 months before the TG-2 iHS and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XF1 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm XF1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Fujifilm XF1
| TG-2 iHS | Fujifilm XF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | September 2012 | Fresher by 9 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm XF1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 provides outside dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and TG-2 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XF1 has got the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF easier. The older Fujifilm XF1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-09-17 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $380 |
