Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and TG-6 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm XF1 was released 7 years prior to the TG-6 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades versus the TG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XF1 & Olympus Tough TG-6. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus TG-6
| Fujifilm XF1 | TG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Fujifilm XF1
| TG-6 | Fujifilm XF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2019 |  | September 2012 | More recent by 81 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus TG-6
| Fujifilm XF1 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 features external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has proportions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the TG-6.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and TG-6 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF1 and TG-6.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels but different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 has got the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The older Fujifilm XF1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2019-05-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 253g (0.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $449 |
