Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and VR-320 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm XF1 was revealed 15 months later than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades vs the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XF1 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm XF1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 15 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm XF1
VR-320 | Fujifilm XF1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm XF1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF1 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XF1 versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the VR-320.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and VR-320.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will render greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XF1 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 199 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $380 | $179 |