Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and VR-320 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm XF1 was revealed 15 months later than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades vs the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm XF1 VR-320 
RevealedSeptember 2012July 2011More recent by 15 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm XF1

 VR-320 Fujifilm XF1 

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm XF1 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF1 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm XF1 versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the VR-320.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and VR-320.

All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will render greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XF1 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
42
focusing manually
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (2/3")
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (2/3")
more heavy than average in class (255g)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography information
31
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (2/3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XF1
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
60
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (255g)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
54
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (2/3")
does not have Timelapse function
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging information
34
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than average in class (255 grams)
32
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm XF1Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm XF1 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-09-17 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 255 gr (0.56 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 199 not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $380 $179