Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Below is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and VR-330 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XF1 was introduced 20 months later than the VR-330 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus VR-330

 Fujifilm XF1 VR-330 
ReleasedSeptember 2012February 2011More recent by 20 months
Manual focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Fujifilm XF1

 VR-330 Fujifilm XF1 

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus VR-330

 Fujifilm XF1 VR-330 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Screen resolution460k460kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XF1 provides physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the VR-330.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and VR-330 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF1 and VR-330.

Clearly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XF1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography highlights
42
manual focus
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
33
good resolution (14MP)
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm XF1
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (2/3")
heavier than average (255 grams)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
31
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (2/3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography highlights
60
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average (255 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
70
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography factors
54
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (2/3")
missing Time Lapse function
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging information
34
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic port
heavier than average (255g)
32
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus VR-330
 Fujifilm XF1Olympus VR-330
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm XF1 Olympus VR-330
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-09-17 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 7.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 255 gr (0.56 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 199 not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $380 $220