Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XF1 was launched 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores vs the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 Fujifilm XF1 GR Digital III 
LaunchedSeptember 2012July 2009Fresher by 39 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Fujifilm XF1

 GR Digital III Fujifilm XF1 
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 Fujifilm XF1 GR Digital III 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XF1 features exterior dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the GR Digital III.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and GR Digital III.

All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XF1 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm XF1 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XF1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm XF1
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
42
focusing manually
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (2/3")
40
has manual focus
saves RAW files
low MP (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography details
61
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (2/3")
heavier than competition in class (255 grams)
55
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
31
image stabilization (Optical)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (2/3")
lack of phase detect AF
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XF1
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
60
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (255g)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
63
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Landscape photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography details
54
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (2/3")
no Time Lapse function
45
has manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging factors
34
relatively wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no mic jack
heavier than competition in class (255g)
25
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic socket
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XF1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Fujifilm XF1Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm XF1 Ricoh GR Digital III
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-09-17 2009-07-27
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 255 grams (0.56 pounds) 208 grams (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 199 not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $380 $399