Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and SL102 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XF1 was unveiled 3 years after the SL102 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades vs the SL102 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung SL102. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm XF1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 45 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm XF1
| SL102 | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm XF1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XF1 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XF1 and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and SL102.
To sum up, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XF1 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm XF1 will give you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XF1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $380 | $130 |