Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as IT100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Fujifilm XF1 versus Samsung SL820, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and SL820 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XF1 was launched 3 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm XF1 matches up against the SL820 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung SL820. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Samsung SL820
| Fujifilm XF1 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2012 | February 2009 | More recent by 44 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Fujifilm XF1
| SL820 | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung SL820
| Fujifilm XF1 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF1 enjoys outer measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XF1 versus Samsung SL820 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the SL820.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and SL820 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XF1 and SL820.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern Fujifilm XF1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung SL820 |
| Also called | - | IT100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $280 |