Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm XF1 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and WB800F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XF1 was released 3 months earlier than the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm XF1 matches up versus the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XF1 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XF1 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm XF1
| WB800F | Fujifilm XF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XF1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 has exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XF1 versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 versus the WB800F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF1 and WB800F.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XF1 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB800F will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $380 | $300 |