Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR
88 Imaging
68 Features
64 Overall
66
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9658/f96585997f48a0d436a928ac38c4198cc59fa35e" alt="Fujifilm XF10 front Fujifilm XF10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 279g - 113 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched July 2018
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XF10 (24MP) and GR (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm XF10 was announced 5 years after the GR which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm XF10 grades versus the GR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XF10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF10 over the Ricoh GR
Fujifilm XF10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2018 | ![]() | April 2013 | Newer by 64 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Fujifilm XF10
GR | Fujifilm XF10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR
Fujifilm XF10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF10 provides physical measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 279 grams (0.62 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XF10 vs the GR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a332d/a332d5a26e0679ef87dc530c5e1d8b27ff0b8897" alt="Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR size comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XF10 and GR is 88 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c60c6/c60c6d70f98b033b1895971223252be904ec5850" alt="Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF10 and GR.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm XF10 to result in greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XF10 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1b9a/b1b9abc4ebf8c380ebf873f12fc887bc17baa059" alt="Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32f3a/32f3a898f31ad419cac08ffcb7bba43cf94fb090" alt="Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Fujifilm XF10 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm XF10 | Ricoh GR |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-07-19 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 91 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 300 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.30 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 15p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 279 grams (0.62 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 290 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $500 | $971 |