Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II
88 Imaging
69 Features
64 Overall
67
![Fujifilm XF10 front Fujifilm XF10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XF10/Fujifilm-XF10-front.jpg)
![Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GR-II/Ricoh-GR-II-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 279g - 113 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched July 2018
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR II, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XF10 (24MP) and GR II (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm XF10 was unveiled 3 years later than the GR II and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XF10 matches up versus the GR II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR II. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XF10 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF10 over the Ricoh GR II
Fujifilm XF10 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2018 | ![]() | June 2015 | More recent by 38 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Fujifilm XF10
GR II | Fujifilm XF10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR II
Fujifilm XF10 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XF10 has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 279 grams (0.62 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to the GR II.
![Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XF10-vs-Ricoh-GR-II-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XF10 and GR II is 88 and 89 respectively.
![Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XF10-vs-Ricoh-GR-II-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF10 and GR II.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XF10 to give greater detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XF10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-XF10-vs-Ricoh-GR-II-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XF10-vs-Ricoh-GR-II-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Fujifilm XF10 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm XF10 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-07-19 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 91 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 300 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.30 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 15p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 279 grams (0.62 lb) | 251 grams (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $599 |