Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
93 Imaging
40 Features
35 Overall
38
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 179g - 104 x 67 x 26mm
- Released January 2015
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm XP70
- New Model is Fujifilm XP90
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm XP80 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP80 (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP80 was revealed 3 years after the Easyshare M5370 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP80 grades vs the Easyshare M5370 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XP80 & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP80 Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP80 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| Fujifilm XP80 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2015 | September 2011 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Fujifilm XP80
| Easyshare M5370 | Fujifilm XP80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP80 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| Fujifilm XP80 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP80 has got external measurements of 104mm x 67mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP80 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP80 versus the Easyshare M5370.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP80 and Easyshare M5370 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP80 and Easyshare M5370.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos although you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The younger Fujifilm XP80 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP80 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm XP80 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-01-14 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 67 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45S | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $149 | $160 |