Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
41 Features
35 Overall
38
![Fujifilm XP80 front Fujifilm XP80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XP80/Fujifilm-XP80-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-M1/Ricoh-WG-M1-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 179g - 104 x 67 x 26mm
- Announced January 2015
- Replaced the Fujifilm XP70
- Replacement is Fujifilm XP90
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XP80 versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP80 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm XP80 was announced 5 months later than the WG-M1 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP80 matches up versus the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XP80 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP80 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP80 over the Ricoh WG-M1
Fujifilm XP80 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm XP80
WG-M1 | Fujifilm XP80 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP80 and Ricoh WG-M1
Fujifilm XP80 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | ![]() | September 2014 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP80 offers external dimensions of 104mm x 67mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP80 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XP80 and the WG-M1.
![Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XP80-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP80 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XP80-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP80 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP80 to show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively.
![Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-XP80-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XP80-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XP80 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Fujifilm XP80 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm XP80 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-01-14 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 9cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 1.5" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179g (0.39 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 67 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45S | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $149 | $2,000 |