Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Superseded the Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak C135, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and the C135 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP90 was announced 4 years after the C135 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm XP90 scores against the C135 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XP90 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Kodak C135
| Fujifilm XP90 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 49 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+808k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Fujifilm XP90
| C135 | Fujifilm XP90 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Kodak C135
| Fujifilm XP90 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP90 features external dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak C135 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 against the C135.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP90 and C135 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP90 and C135.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm XP90 to produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP90 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2016-01-15 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.4" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 pounds) | 175g (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45S | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $180 | $0 |