Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
![Fujifilm XP90 front Fujifilm XP90 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XP90/Fujifilm-XP90-front.jpg)
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm XP90 was unveiled 4 years after the Easyshare M5370 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm XP90 grades vs the Easyshare M5370 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XP90 and Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery and Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
Fujifilm XP90 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 53 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Fujifilm XP90
Easyshare M5370 | Fujifilm XP90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
Fujifilm XP90 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP90 offers external dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 against the Easyshare M5370.
![Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XP90-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP90 and Easyshare M5370 is 91 and 95 respectively.
![Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XP90-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP90 and Easyshare M5370.
As you have seen, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of pictures although you should always take the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern Fujifilm XP90 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-XP90-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XP90-vs-Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-01-15 | 2011-09-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 9cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 203 gr (0.45 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45S | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $180 | $160 |