Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26375/263753b0299bc6f83193b427a02b5e84c57a46f4" alt="Fujifilm XP90 front Fujifilm XP90 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP90 was announced 4 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm XP90 matches up versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XP90 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm XP90 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 55 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm XP90
VR-320 | Fujifilm XP90 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm XP90 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP90 offers outside measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0155/e01552936c771064c2dad86db624eaf906ef310c" alt="Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP90 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88b8a/88b8adbdfd2c48ab7fff2b26fc47d61e06098e77" alt="Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP90 and VR-320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Fujifilm XP90 to give you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP90 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc589/bc58997a5385f429e78bcf50e4cce204a34e064a" alt="Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04957/04957f777895973bb8b2d51659da018670fac202" alt="Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm XP90 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm XP90 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-01-15 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 9cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 203g (0.45 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45S | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $180 | $179 |