Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
Fujifilm XP90
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm XP80
Samsung DV300F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Fujifilm XP90 versus Samsung DV300F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XP90 was brought out 4 years later than the DV300F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP90 scores vs the DV300F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XP90 & Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Samsung DV300F
| Fujifilm XP90 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 50 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Fujifilm XP90
| DV300F | Fujifilm XP90 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Samsung DV300F
| Fujifilm XP90 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP90 enjoys physical dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP90 versus Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 against the DV300F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP90 and DV300F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP90 and DV300F.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photos however you really should factor the age of the products into consideration. The newer Fujifilm XP90 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm XP90
Portrait photography with Samsung DV300F
decent megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm XP90 Street photography highlights
Samsung DV300F Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (133 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Fujifilm XP90 Sports photography factors
Samsung DV300F Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (210 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XP90 Travel photography advice
Samsung DV300F Travel photography advice
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
terrible battery power (210 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competitors in class (133 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm XP90
Landscape photography with Samsung DV300F
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
environment proofing
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery power (210 CIPA)
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm XP90
Vlogging with Samsung DV300F
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competitors in class (133g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XP90 | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-01-15 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 lb) | 133g (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45S | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $180 | $200 |
