Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm XP90 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP90 was launched 7 years after the SL102 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP90 grades vs the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XP90 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm XP90 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 86 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm XP90
| SL102 | Fujifilm XP90 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm XP90 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP90 enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP90 versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 versus the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP90 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP90 and SL102.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm XP90 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP90 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XP90 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-01-15 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45S | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $180 | $130 |