Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Fujifilm XP90 and Samsung SL202, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP90 was unveiled 7 years after the SL202 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm XP90 matches up vs the SL202 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XP90 and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm XP90 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 | February 2009 | More modern by 85 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm XP90
| SL202 | Fujifilm XP90 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm XP90 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP90 features external measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP90 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to the SL202.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP90 and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP90 and SL202.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP90 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP90 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP90 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm XP90 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-01-15 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45S | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $180 | $140 |