Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released November 2013
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and M320 (1/2.5") boast different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XQ1 was launched 4 years after the M320 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm XQ1 grades against the M320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak M320
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| M320 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M320
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ1 comes with outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak M320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 and the M320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and M320 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and M320.
As you have seen, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm XQ1 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XQ1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-11-26 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $500 | $39 |
