Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Replacement is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released July 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the M341 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and M341 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XQ1 was manufactured 4 years after the M341 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up against the M341 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak EasyShare M341. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Kodak M341 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak M341
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| M341 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M341
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XQ1 offers external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M341 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak M341 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs the M341.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and M341 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and M341.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 contains the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The more recent Fujifilm XQ1 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M341 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M341 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-26 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $130 |
