Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced November 2013
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M380, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the M380 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and M380 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XQ1 was revealed 4 years after the M380 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores against the M380 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak EasyShare M380. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Kodak M380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak M380
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| M380 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M380
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XQ1 has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M380 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M380 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs the M380.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and M380 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ1 and M380.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm XQ1 will give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XQ1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M380 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M380 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-11-26 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-190mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1448s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $160 |