Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Replacement is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced July 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the M381 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and M381 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XQ1 was launched 4 years later than the M381 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores vs the M381 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 & Kodak EasyShare M381. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak M381
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 53 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| M381 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M381
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XQ1 comes with external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak M381 has specifications of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M381 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 and the M381.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and M381 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ1 and M381.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ1 comes with the bigger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The more recent Fujifilm XQ1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-26 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 153 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $170 |