Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
97 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Later Model is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak Mini, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the Mini (10MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and Mini (1/3") possess different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was announced 2 years after the Mini which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores vs the Mini for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ1 & Kodak EasyShare Mini. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Kodak Mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak Mini
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Fujifilm XQ1
| Mini | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak Mini
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak Mini has dimensions of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak Mini in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 against the Mini.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and Mini is 92 and 97 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Mini.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ1 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Fujifilm XQ1 will offer more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XQ1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak Mini Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare Mini |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-26 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3640 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 29-87mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 99g (0.22 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $500 | $100 |