Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched November 2013
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2000
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 115g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the S230 (10MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and S230 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XQ1 was revealed 4 years later than the S230 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores versus the S230 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ1 & Nikon Coolpix S230. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Nikon S230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Nikon S230
| Fujifilm XQ1 | S230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 59 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S230 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| S230 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Nikon S230
| Fujifilm XQ1 | S230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ1 comes with external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S230 has sizing of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 against the S230.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and S230 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XQ1 and S230.
All in all, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ1 with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm XQ1 will offer extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XQ1 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S230 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Nikon Coolpix S230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Nikon Coolpix S230 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-11-26 | 2009-02-03 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 2000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 115g (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $500 | $150 |
