Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Successor is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm XQ1 and Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and S6900 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and S6900 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XQ1 was introduced 14 months prior to the S6900 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up against the S6900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 & Nikon Coolpix S6900. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Nikon S6900
| Fujifilm XQ1 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| S6900 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | November 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Nikon S6900
| Fujifilm XQ1 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Nikon S6900 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XQ1 and Nikon S6900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 versus the S6900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and S6900 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ1 and S6900.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Nikon S6900 will show greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm XQ1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-26 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 181 gr (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 180 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-48 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $500 | $190 |