Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced November 2013
- Replacement is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and TG-860 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was released 14 months before the TG-860 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores vs the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ1 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Olympus TG-860
| Fujifilm XQ1 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| TG-860 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | November 2013 | Fresher by 14 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Olympus TG-860
| Fujifilm XQ1 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ1 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 versus the TG-860.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ1 and TG-860 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ1 and TG-860.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ1 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will show more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm XQ1 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-11-26 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-48 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $500 | $279 |