Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched November 2013
- Newer Model is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120, both Ultracompact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the VG-120 (14MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and VG-120 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was manufactured 2 years later than the VG-120 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm XQ1 grades vs the VG-120 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ1 & Olympus VG-120. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Olympus VG-120
| Fujifilm XQ1 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| VG-120 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Olympus VG-120
| Fujifilm XQ1 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm XQ1 has external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-120 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 and the VG-120.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and VG-120 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and VG-120.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ1 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VG-120 will show greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XQ1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Olympus VG-120 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Olympus VG-120 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-11-26 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 120 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 160 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $190 |