Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
38 Features
55 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Updated by Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and VR-320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XQ1 was revealed 2 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm XQ1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up against the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm XQ1 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 29 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| VR-320 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm XQ1 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ1 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 and the VR-320.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specs. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ1 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ1 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will provide greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XQ1 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-11-26 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $500 | $179 |