Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Updated by Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as PL10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and CL5 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was released 4 years after the CL5 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm XQ1 grades against the CL5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Samsung CL5
| Fujifilm XQ1 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 58 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| CL5 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung CL5
| Fujifilm XQ1 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm XQ1 comes with external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs the CL5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and CL5 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XQ1 and CL5.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ1 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Fujifilm XQ1 will render more detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XQ1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also Known as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-26 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $500 | $391 |