Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released November 2013
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and ST65 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was manufactured 2 years after the ST65 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm XQ1 grades against the ST65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ1 & Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Samsung ST65
| Fujifilm XQ1 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 35 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| ST65 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung ST65
| Fujifilm XQ1 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 provides outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 against the ST65.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ1 and ST65.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung ST65 will provide more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XQ1 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-11-26 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $130 |