Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Later Model is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and ST95 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XQ1 was announced 2 years later than the ST95 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up vs the ST95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XQ1 & Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm XQ1 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| ST95 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm XQ1 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XQ1 has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs the ST95.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and ST95 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and ST95.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ1 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung ST95 will give more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XQ1 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung ST95 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-26 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $145 |