Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Updated by Fujifilm XQ2
Samsung TL205
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung TL205, both Ultracompact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and TL205 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XQ1 was brought out 3 years after the TL205 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up versus the TL205 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Samsung TL205
| Fujifilm XQ1 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| TL205 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung TL205
| Fujifilm XQ1 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung TL205 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 compared to the TL205.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and TL205.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 includes the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF easier. The newer Fujifilm XQ1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm XQ1
Portrait photography with Samsung TL205
you can focus manually
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL205 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
very small sensor size (2/3")
more heavy than competition in class (206g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than others (177g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm XQ1
Sports photography with Samsung TL205
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good battery life (240 CIPA)
has phase detect autofocus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL205 as a Travel photography camera
good battery life (240 CIPA)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (206 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than others (177 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 Landscape photography features
Samsung TL205 Landscape photography features
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (240 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
does not have Timelapse recording
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 Vlogging info
Samsung TL205 Vlogging info
relatively wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (206 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than others (177 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung TL205 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL100 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-26 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 177 gr (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $180 |