Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XQ2
Sony T900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XQ1 was released 4 years after the T900 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up against the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Sony T900
| Fujifilm XQ1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| T900 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Sony T900
| Fujifilm XQ1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ1 offers physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 and the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ1 and T900.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ1 has the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The newer Fujifilm XQ1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 Portrait photography details
Sony T900 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (2/3")
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm XQ1
Street photography with Sony T900
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (2/3")
more heavy than competitors (206g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 Sports photography highlights
Sony T900 Sports photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
better than average battery life (240 shots)
supports phase detect auto focus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (2/3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm XQ1
Travel photography with Sony T900
better than average battery life (240 shots)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (206g)
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (240 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (2/3")
does not have Timelapse mode
has manual focus
very good size screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XQ1 Vlogging factors
Sony T900 Vlogging factors
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competitors (206 grams)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-26 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $500 | $300 |
