Clicky

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
57
Overall
46
Fujifilm XQ2 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs

Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced January 2015
  • Superseded the Fujifilm XQ1
Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Revealed July 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the M341 (12MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and M341 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm XQ2 was manufactured 5 years later than the M341 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up versus the M341 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Kodak M341

 Fujifilm XQ2 M341 
RevealedJanuary 2015July 2009Fresher by 67 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Fujifilm XQ2

 M341 Fujifilm XQ2 

Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak M341

 Fujifilm XQ2 M341 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ2 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak M341 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak M341 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 compared to the M341.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ2 and M341 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ2 and M341.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ2 uses the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF easier. The younger Fujifilm XQ2 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M341 as a Portrait photography camera
43
focusing manually
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Street photography factors
Kodak M341 Street photography factors
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
very small sensor size (2/3")
heavier than others in class (206g)
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Sports photography details
Kodak M341 Sports photography details
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery (240 per charge)
comes with phase detect autofocus
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Travel photography information
Kodak M341 Travel photography information
64
better than average battery (240 CIPA)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (206 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
52
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M341 as a Landscape photography camera
56
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (240 shots)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
missing Time Lapse function
28
screen size is good (3")
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Vlogging factors
Kodak M341 Vlogging factors
34
really wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than others in class (206g)
22
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M341 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak M341
 Fujifilm XQ2Kodak EasyShare M341
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm XQ2 Kodak EasyShare M341
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2015-01-14 2009-07-29
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR Processor II -
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focusing distance 3cm 10cm
Crop factor 4.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 12.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow syncho Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206g (0.45 lb) 135g (0.30 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-48 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $299 $130