Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
97 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced January 2015
- Superseded the Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-87mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 99g - 86 x 53 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Fujifilm XQ2 versus Kodak Mini, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the Mini (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and Mini (1/3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XQ2 was announced 4 years later than the Mini and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up against the Mini with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ2 & Kodak EasyShare Mini. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery & Kodak Mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Kodak Mini
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Mini over the Fujifilm XQ2
| Mini | Fujifilm XQ2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak Mini
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XQ2 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak Mini has proportions of 86mm x 53mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 99 grams (0.22 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XQ2 versus Kodak Mini in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 and the Mini.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ2 and Mini is 92 and 97 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The visual below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Mini.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XQ2 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm XQ2 will give more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XQ2 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak Mini Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Kodak EasyShare Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ2 | Kodak EasyShare Mini |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-01-14 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3640 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 29-87mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 99 gr (0.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 86 x 53 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $100 |