Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
![Fujifilm XQ2 front Fujifilm XQ2 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XQ2/Fujifilm-XQ2-front.jpg)
![Kodak M590 front Kodak M590 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-M590/Kodak-M590-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced January 2015
- Older Model is Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 58 x 15mm
- Released August 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Fujifilm XQ2 versus Kodak M590, both Ultracompact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the M590 (14MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and M590 (1/3") offer different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm XQ2 was introduced 4 years later than the M590 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm XQ2 grades against the M590 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XQ2 & Kodak M590. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery & Kodak M590 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Kodak M590
Fujifilm XQ2 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 54 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M590 over the Fujifilm XQ2
M590 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak M590
Fujifilm XQ2 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ2 comes with external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak M590 has sizing of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XQ2 versus Kodak M590 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 compared to the M590.
![Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 size comparison Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XQ2-vs-Kodak-M590-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ2 and M590 is 92 and 99 respectively.
![Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XQ2-vs-Kodak-M590-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ2 and M590.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ2 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Kodak M590 will result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XQ2 should have an edge in sensor tech.
![Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-XQ2-vs-Kodak-M590-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-XQ2-vs-Kodak-M590-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M590 Specifications
Fujifilm XQ2 | Kodak M590 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm XQ2 | Kodak M590 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-01-14 | 2010-08-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3242 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 97 x 58 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $299 | $120 |