Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched January 2015
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and CL80 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XQ2 was announced 5 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up vs the CL80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ2 & Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Samsung CL80
| Fujifilm XQ2 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2015 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 62 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| CL80 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Samsung CL80
| Fujifilm XQ2 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ2 offers outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 against the CL80.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ2 and CL80 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ2 and CL80.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ2 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung CL80 will provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XQ2 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ2 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST5500 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2015-01-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $400 |