Clicky

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
57
Overall
46
Fujifilm XQ2 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed January 2015
  • Replaced the Fujifilm XQ1
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and ST65 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm XQ2 was revealed 4 years after the ST65 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up against the ST65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Samsung ST65

 Fujifilm XQ2 ST65 
AnnouncedJanuary 2015January 2011More modern by 49 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Fujifilm XQ2

 ST65 Fujifilm XQ2 

Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Samsung ST65

 Fujifilm XQ2 ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XQ2 comes with outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 and the ST65.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ2 and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ2 and ST65.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XQ2 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST65 will deliver more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XQ2 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Portrait photography features
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography features
43
has manual focus
includes face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
28
good MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Street photography info
Samsung ST65 Street photography info
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
more heavy than competitors in class (206 grams)
49
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Sports photography camera
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery power (240 CIPA)
has phase detect autofocus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
26
good MP (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Travel photography camera
64
better than average battery power (240 CIPA)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (206 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
good MP (14MP)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Landscape photography details
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography details
56
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (240 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
missing Timelapse mode
37
good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
good MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XQ2 Vlogging features
Samsung ST65 Vlogging features
34
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (206 grams)
27
good max aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XQ2 and Samsung ST65
 Fujifilm XQ2Samsung ST65
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm XQ2 Samsung ST65
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-01-14 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Processor II -
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/1.8-4.9 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 12.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow syncho -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lb) -
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-48 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $299 $130