Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Portability
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XQ1
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and TL320 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XQ2 was unveiled 5 years after the TL320 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm XQ2 scores versus the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XQ2 & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Samsung TL320
| Fujifilm XQ2 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2015 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 72 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| TL320 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Samsung TL320
| Fujifilm XQ2 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ2 offers exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 versus the TL320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ2 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ2 and TL320.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ2 contains the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh easier. The fresher Fujifilm XQ2 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
has manual focus
provides face detect focus
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
sensor is small (2/3")
heavier than competitors in class (206 grams)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Sports photography advice
Samsung TL320 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
good battery (240 shots)
has phase detect autofocus
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (2/3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (240 shots)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (206 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
good battery (240 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XQ2 Vlogging features
Samsung TL320 Vlogging features
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic support
heavier than competitors in class (206g)
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ2 | Samsung TL320 |
| Alternative name | - | WB1000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $380 |
