Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Superseded the Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XQ2 was announced 5 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up vs the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XQ2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Sony T900
| Fujifilm XQ2 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 72 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| T900 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Sony T900
| Fujifilm XQ2 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XQ2 has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 vs the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ2 and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XQ2 and T900.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ2 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh simpler. The fresher Fujifilm XQ2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $299 | $300 |