Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-E Typ 220, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Leica. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) provide different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D II 50C was brought out 6 years after the M-E Typ 220 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the X1D II 50C matches up versus the M-E Typ 220 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-E Typ 220. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica M-E Typ 220
X1D II 50C | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | September 2012 | More modern by 83 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1.1") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 230k | Clearer display (+2130k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M-E Typ 220 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-E Typ 220
X1D II 50C | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Leica M-E Typ 220 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-E Typ 220 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the M-E Typ 220.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and M-E Typ 220 is 60 and 79 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and M-E Typ 220.
All in all, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail having its extra 33MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M-E Typ 220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5212 x 3472 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 2500 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Available lenses | 13 | 59 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | none |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 585 grams (1.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 787 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Pricing at release | $5,750 | $0 |