Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
74 Imaging
71 Features
47 Overall
61
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2014
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Leica. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and M Edition 60 (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and M Edition 60 (Full frame) use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D II 50C was brought out 4 years after the M Edition 60 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the M Edition 60 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Leica M Edition 60. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Leica M Edition 60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica M Edition 60
X1D II 50C | M Edition 60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | September 2014 | More modern by 58 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1440k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Edition 60 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M Edition 60 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M Edition 60
X1D II 50C | M Edition 60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Leica M Edition 60 has proportions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the M Edition 60.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and M Edition 60 is 60 and 74 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and M Edition 60.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you greater detail having its extra 27MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Edition 60 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M Edition 60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M Edition 60 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2014-09-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5952 x 3976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Number of lenses | 13 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 680 grams (1.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch cost | $5,750 | - |