Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
78 Imaging
65 Features
23 Overall
48
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 10000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched May 2012
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Overview
The following is a extended review of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-Monochrom, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and M-Monochrom (18MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and M-Monochrom (Full frame) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was revealed 7 years after the M-Monochrom which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores against the M-Monochrom with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Leica M-Monochrom. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Leica M-Monochrom Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica M-Monochrom
X1D II 50C | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | May 2012 | Newer by 87 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1.1") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 230k | Sharper screen (+2130k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M-Monochrom over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M-Monochrom | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-Monochrom
X1D II 50C | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Leica M-Monochrom has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M-Monochrom in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the X1D II 50C and the M-Monochrom.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and M-Monochrom is 60 and 78 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and M-Monochrom.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in extra detail because of its extra 33 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M-Monochrom Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M-Monochrom | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M-Monochrom |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2012-05-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5212 x 3472 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 10000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with a sapphire glass LCD cover |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 32 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 600g (1.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Cost at launch | $5,750 | $7,950 |