Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced September 2012
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D II 50C was revealed 6 years later than the M Typ 240 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the M Typ 240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M Typ 240. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica M Typ 240
X1D II 50C | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | September 2012 | More recent by 83 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Crisper display (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M Typ 240 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M Typ 240
X1D II 50C | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 240 has proportions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the M Typ 240.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and M Typ 240 is 60 and 74 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and M Typ 240.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with more detail because of its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M Typ 240 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2012-09-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5952 x 3976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Total lenses | 13 | 59 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 1% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 680 grams (1.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 84 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Launch price | $5,750 | $5,479 |