Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
79 Imaging
63 Features
30 Overall
49
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2009
- Updated by Leica M9-P
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Leica M9, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Leica. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and M9 (18MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and M9 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D II 50C was released 9 years later than the M9 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the X1D II 50C matches up versus the M9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Leica M9. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Leica M9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica M9
X1D II 50C | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | September 2009 | Fresher by 119 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1.1") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 230k | Crisper screen (+2130k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M9 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica M9
X1D II 50C | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Leica M9 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Leica M9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the M9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and M9 is 60 and 79 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and M9.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 33MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica M9 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica M9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2009-09-09 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5212 x 3472 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 2500 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 585 gr (1.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch cost | $5,750 | $2,750 |