Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


60 Imaging
80 Features
66 Overall
74
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Announced October 2020

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Leica Q2 Monochrom, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Hasselblad and Leica. The resolution of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) is very similar but the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was announced 16 months prior to the Q2 Monochrom making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the Q2 Monochrom in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Leica Q2 Monochrom. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
X1D II 50C | Q2 Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Q2 Monochrom | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | ![]() | June 2019 | More modern by 16 months |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica Q2 Monochrom
X1D II 50C | Q2 Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica Q2 Monochrom has proportions of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") with a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Leica Q2 Monochrom in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the X1D II 50C against the Q2 Monochrom.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and Q2 Monochrom is 60 and 60 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and Q2 Monochrom.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged X1D II 50C is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica Q2 Monochrom | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica Q2 Monochrom |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2020-10-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 47MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 8368 x 5584 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 100000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 17cm |
Available lenses | 13 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 3,680 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.76x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | 1/40000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | none |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 734 gr (1.62 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP-SCL4 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $5,750 | $5,995 |